header-logo header-logo

Lawyers at SGM demand legal aid rethink

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

News

The government’s controversial plans for legal aid were unanimously rejected by around 400 solicitors at a specially convened Law Society Special General Meeting (SGM) in Chancery Lane last week.
The mostly legal aid practitioners gave their overwhelming support to a motion tabled last year by Roger Peach, a solicitor at Southampton law firm Peach Grey & Co.

The motion calls for solicitors to knock back the government’s plans to introduce competitive tendering between firms and the awarding of fixed-length contracts for legal aid work. It also urges the Law Society to renegotiate terms for criminal defence contracts.

Andrew Holroyd, Law Society vice president, says: “The SGM highlights the strength of feeling among solicitors about the current legal aid reforms. The Law Society wants the same result as all the solicitors who attended the meeting—to secure a sustainable future for legal aid and to protect vulnerable clients. We continue to lobby intensively to secure a viable future for legal aid.”

Holroyd and Law Society chief executive Des Hudson, giving evidence on the reforms to the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee last week, said the proposals threaten access to justice by damaging the  legal aid supplier base.

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll