header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Lawyers predict European drive on insurance claims

Innocuous claims could have potential to cost MIB dear

A Court of Appeal decision may have far reaching consequences for the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) after it was ruled that the victims of uninsured drivers may be able to rely on a European Directive for claims.

In McCall v Poulton and Motor Insurers’ Bureau and ors [2008] All ER (D) 212 (Nov) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the county court to refer questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the obligations of the MIB to compensate the victims of uninsured drivers.

Nicholas Bevan, personal injury specialist at Bond Pearce, says that what began as a fairly innocuous claim has the potential to cost MIB dear.

“Lord Justice Waller has remitted the following questions to the ECJ: first, whether the Marleasing principles applied to the interpretation of the Uninsured Drivers Agreement with the effect that they should be construed in such a way that gives full effect to the Motor Insurance Directives, and second, whether the bureau is an emanation of the state,” he says.

MIB says

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll