header-logo header-logo

28 June 2017
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers hit out at flaws in PM’s plans for EU nationals

Lawyers have hit out at flaws in the Prime Minister’s immigration status pledge to EU nationals.

Prime Minister Theresa May has said EU citizens who arrived in the UK before the Article 50 trigger date of 29 March 2017 will be given similar rights to UK citizens. Those arriving after that date can stay for two years then apply for a work permit.

However, Nick Rollason, immigration law partner at Kingsley Napley, said the proposal would anger many EU nationals, and created uncertainty. ‘Since the referendum, over 100,000 EU nationals and their family members have applied for, and obtained, EU Permanent Residence status,’ he said.

‘Making them re-apply is a waste, not only of their time and money, but also of UK public funds and of Home Office resources.’

The Bar Council, which published the third edition of its Brexit Papers last week, warned the European Court of Justice (CJEU) could be ‘a major stumbling block in negotiations’.

Hugh Mercer QC, chairman of the Bar’s Brexit Working Group, said: ‘Apart from agreeing the categories of citizens who have acquired these rights, the big question around these “acquired rights” is; how will UK and EU citizens enforce the terms of that deal if they run in to difficulties with national authorities, or if the UK and other states disagree over the operation of the new rules?

‘The answer may be to create a mechanism for obtaining an Advisory Opinion in disputes before UK courts or for UK courts to have due regard to CJEU rulings, and an obligation of consistent interpretation to ensure equality, legal certainty and the maintenance of the quality of the rights.’

 

Issue: 7752 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll