header-logo header-logo

12 May 2021
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Judicial review , Immigration & asylum , Planning
printer mail-detail

Lawyers give cool reception to Queen's Speech

Lawyers brace for judicial review battle after reforms proposed

Lawyers have given an unenthusiastic response to the Queen’s Speech programme of 30 bills for the next Parliamentary term.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill would be meaningless without investment in the criminal justice system. She called for legal aid to be restored for early advice in housing, family and other areas.

However, it was the proposal to bring forward judicial review reform that caused most concern. Boyce said this risked ‘taking power away from citizens and putting more into the hands of government.

‘The independent panel convened by government to review the relationship between the courts and the state found no evidence of judicial overreach. Judicial review is an essential check on power’.

Chair of the Bar Council, Derek Sweeting QC agreed: ‘The judicial review process is central to access to justice for the public. We are concerned that some of the proposed reforms are far-reaching with insufficient time allowed for consultation or scrutiny.’

Both the Bar Council and the Law Society have expressed concerns about the Home Office’s ‘confused’ New Plan for Immigration consultation, which would be brought forward in a sovereign borders bill.

Another bill promised to ease planning controls and increase housebuilding in England.

Marnix Elsenaar, head of planning at Addleshaw Goddard, said: ‘The government has promised a Planning Bill to "modernise the planning system, so that more homes can be built". That's all we got. 

‘The Bill is likely to require local authorities to allocate land either for growth, so that new homes, schools, offices and shops will get a fast-track to planning approval, or for protection. Rumour has it that a third "regeneration" zone is being considered. What we can say with certainty is that the Bill will be a big step on the road away from the development control system that we're used to, towards a US-style zonal system that front-loads community engagement to the plan-making stage and provides a national and local design code that sets the parameters for what you can build.’

Other bills included a skills and post-16 education bill for England, and new laws to scrap the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll