header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Lawyers dismiss PDS as daylight robbery

News

Defence lawyers have dismissed Legal Services Commission (LSC) claims that the Public Defender Service (PDS) provides a better quality of service than private practice.

The LSC claims are made on the back of independent research, published this week, based on analysis of the PDS during its first three years of operation. The PDS was set up in 2001 as the first salaried criminal defence service provider in England and Wales.

The study shows that during the start-up period, when the PDS was building up its caseload, it had higher costs than other criminal defence providers in the same areas.

Its conclusions state that: “[T]he case that the PDS can provide general criminal defence services at a comparable cost to contract providers remains unproven.

Even using our ‘low’ estimate of PDS costs, based on their running costs only and excluding capital and start-up costs, there was a very significant cost differential between the average case costs of the PDS during its first three years of operation and comparable private practice, ranging from between 40% to just over 90% higher for the PDS depending on the area and type of case.”

Legal Aid Practitioners Group director Richard Miller says: “The evidence shows that the Birmingham and Liverpool PDS offices performed worse in quality terms than the average of all private practice firms in their region, while the other offices performed only a little better than average.

“These offices had substantially lower caseloads than
private practice firms. They also received substantially more public money per case. The PDS cost around half as much again as private practice, and on some measures more than twice as much. Yet they were still unable to keep up with the best private practice firms on quality.

Andrew Keogh of Tuckers Solicitors says: “The PDS costs
between 41% and 93% more than private practice. “For that act of daylight robbery you get more staff doing fewer hours on less serious cases, yet the legal aid minister claims that the PDS has a future. It beggars belief.”
Defending the service, Gaynor Ogden, head of employed services at the LSC says: “The research report is based on data collected early in the life of the PDS and we have come a long way since then in terms of growth, quality and cost.”

Copies of the 354-page report can be downloaded at www.legalservices.gov.uk/criminal/pds/evaluation.asp.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll