header-logo header-logo

02 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Lawyers’ regulators fail report card

Both the Bar and solicitors’ regulators have failed to meet required standards in their annual Legal Services Board (LSB) performance assessment.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) was criticised for not publishing pass-rate data for the Solicitors Qualifying Examination, leaving aspiring solicitors in the dark about which training provider to choose. The LSB gave it until the autumn to produce this information. The LSB also criticised failures in its supervision of high-risk firms and protection of client funds—revealed after the closure of law firm Axiom Ince in 2023 with about £66m client money missing.

A spokesperson for the SRA said: ‘We will be discussing with our Board and agreeing an action plan.’

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) came in for criticism for being too slow to improve, despite restructuring in December 2024 as part of a ‘reform programme’ agreed with the LSB.

It also takes too long to investigate misconduct complaints against barristers, with only 67% of investigations—the benchmark is 80%—decided within 38 weeks. The LSB found that, while the quality of decisions was high, ‘the significant delays in reaching these decisions is of serious concern, not least because this is an issue that has been present for some years now’. Moreover, the LSB has asked the BSB to explain why it reduced its targets in September 2024 from 80% of investigations completed within 25 weeks to 80% within 38 weeks.

A BSB spokesperson said: ‘We have been in continual dialogue and have provided detailed evidence to respond to the challenges and the concerns the LSB have raised about the pace of change.’ The BSB is due to consult in the summer on changes to its enforcement regulations.

Craig Westwood, the LSB’s chief executive, said there were ‘some concerning shortfalls in regulatory performance, particularly from the two largest regulators’. 

Law Society chief executive Ian Jeffery said: ‘While the events leading to the collapse of Axiom Ince were happening, the SRA was focused on increasing its fining powers and proposing regulatory expansion. Instead, it should have been tackling the known risks from accumulator-style firms and ensuring its operations were joined up and laser focused on protecting consumers.’

Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll