header-logo header-logo

02 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Lawyers’ regulators fail report card

Both the Bar and solicitors’ regulators have failed to meet required standards in their annual Legal Services Board (LSB) performance assessment.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) was criticised for not publishing pass-rate data for the Solicitors Qualifying Examination, leaving aspiring solicitors in the dark about which training provider to choose. The LSB gave it until the autumn to produce this information. The LSB also criticised failures in its supervision of high-risk firms and protection of client funds—revealed after the closure of law firm Axiom Ince in 2023 with about £66m client money missing.

A spokesperson for the SRA said: ‘We will be discussing with our Board and agreeing an action plan.’

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) came in for criticism for being too slow to improve, despite restructuring in December 2024 as part of a ‘reform programme’ agreed with the LSB.

It also takes too long to investigate misconduct complaints against barristers, with only 67% of investigations—the benchmark is 80%—decided within 38 weeks. The LSB found that, while the quality of decisions was high, ‘the significant delays in reaching these decisions is of serious concern, not least because this is an issue that has been present for some years now’. Moreover, the LSB has asked the BSB to explain why it reduced its targets in September 2024 from 80% of investigations completed within 25 weeks to 80% within 38 weeks.

A BSB spokesperson said: ‘We have been in continual dialogue and have provided detailed evidence to respond to the challenges and the concerns the LSB have raised about the pace of change.’ The BSB is due to consult in the summer on changes to its enforcement regulations.

Craig Westwood, the LSB’s chief executive, said there were ‘some concerning shortfalls in regulatory performance, particularly from the two largest regulators’. 

Law Society chief executive Ian Jeffery said: ‘While the events leading to the collapse of Axiom Ince were happening, the SRA was focused on increasing its fining powers and proposing regulatory expansion. Instead, it should have been tackling the known risks from accumulator-style firms and ensuring its operations were joined up and laser focused on protecting consumers.’

Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll