header-logo header-logo

Law Society Responds to Jackson

26 August 2009 / Elizabeth Davidson
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Thousands of accident victims could be affected by the Jackson Review’s proposal to increase the small claims track limit, the Law Society has warned.

Lord Justice Jackson is due to conclude his review of civil litigation costs in December. In a preliminary report in May, he asked for views on whether the small claims track limit should be raised.

In its official response to the proposals, the Law Society warned this could result in “many thousands” of claimants losing substantial amounts of their awards in legal costs or having to represent themselves. The Society estimates there would be more than half a million more litigants in person as a result, which would be an extra burden on the courts.

Lord Jackson’s review also asked whether referral fees should be abolished, conditional fee agreements reformed, and fixed costs used more frequently.

The Law Society supported referral fees, arguing there would always be “marketing costs”. However, it said it would support further research into their effect on costs, access to justice and the behaviour of solicitors.

The Bar Council called for their abolition in its

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll