header-logo header-logo

09 October 2024
Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Law Society: scale back or withdraw over criminal legal aid

Criminal solicitors have been advised by their own professional body to consider quitting rather than ‘hanging on’ if they find criminal legal aid work financially unviable

The Law Society crossed the threshold this week into recommending firms stop waiting for a government decision on fees, review the viability of each part of their criminal practice and, if not viable, stop all or part of their police station and court work.

Last November, it issued a practice note advising solicitors on circumstances where they might refuse police station and court work—areas which received a 9% increase in fees rather than the minimum 15% recommended by the 2021 criminal legal aid independent review (CLAIR). In January, its judicial review against the government’s failure to implement CLAIR succeeded. The general election thwarted action on this, and the new government’s first budget is not until 30 October.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has now said it will announce its decision on fee rates in November—but has asked firms to tender before this for ten-year legal aid contracts due to start next year.

However, incoming Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘We can no longer ask firms to hold on in the hope of action from government that may never come.

‘We recommend firms examine the viability of each type of criminal legal aid work they undertake to decide if they should scale back or withdraw altogether until there is meaningful action by the new government.’

An MoJ spokesperson said: ‘The new government inherited a justice system under enormous strain and a criminal legal aid system facing significant challenges.

‘Criminal defence lawyers play an essential role in ensuring that justice is done. While any decision on future government funding is subject to the upcoming Spending Review, we are committed to working with the legal profession to support the sustainability of the market both now and in the future.’

Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll