header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Law reports: Solicitor—Costs—Conditional fee agreement

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Arden, Thomas, Moore-Bick LJJ and
Master Hurst, 19 December 2008 ;

In July 2000, the claimant was a passenger in a car being driven by her brother, the defendant. He lost control of the vehicle, causing a crash. The claimant suffered serious injuries. She instructed solicitors and, in February 2001, the defendant’s insurers admitted liability on his behalf. Shortly afterwards the claimant instructed new solicitors, with whom she entered a CFA in May 2001. That agreement provided for a success fee of 98%, of which 15% represented the cost of funding. Clause 5 provided: “If we advise you to reject an offer of settlement or payment into court and the case goes ahead to trial where you are awarded damages which are equal to or less than the offer or payment in:- you do not have to pay any of our basic costs or percentage increase for the work done after we receive notice of the offer or payment in...”

Proceedings were issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll