header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitors' costs

Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (a firm) [2009] EWHC 1957 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 326 (Jul)

The focus of the definition of “contentious work” for the purposes of the Solicitors’ (Non-Contentious Business) Remuneration Order 1994 (SI 1994/2616) was on the time when the proceedings were begun, not the time when they ended.

Provided the proceedings were begun before a court, it was then a question of fact, in any given case, whether work was subsequently done either in or for the purposes of those proceedings.

A clear distinction could therefore be drawn from cases where the court had decided that a particular item of property was to be transferred by one party to another, for example in ancillary relief proceedings following a divorce or in proceedings for specific performance of a contract, and where all that remained to be done was to give effect to that decision by carrying out the necessary conveyancing formalities.
 

Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll