header-logo header-logo

30 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

European Community—Common agricultural policy—Requirements for visible public rights of way

R (on the application of Horvath) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs C-428/07, [2009] All ER (D) 233 (Jul)

Court of Justice of the European Communities (Grand Chamber), Judges Skouris (President), Jann, Timmermans, Rosas, Lenaerts and von Danwitz (Presidents of Chambers), Cunha Rodrigues, Silva de Lapuerta, Schiemann, Makarczyk, Lohmus (Rapporteur), Arabadjiev and Toader, 16 July 2009.

A member state may include requirements relating to the maintenance of visible public rights of way in its standards for good agricultural and environmental condition under Art 5 of and Annex IV to Council Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 inasmuch as those requirements contribute to the retention of those rights of way as landscape features or, as the case may be, to the avoidance of the deterioration of habitats.

Further, where the constitutional system of a member state provides that devolved administrations are to have legislative competence, the mere adoption by those administrations of different standards for good agricultural and environmental condition under art 5 of and Annex IV to Regulation 1782/2003 does not constitute discrimination contrary to Community law.
The claimant,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll