header-logo header-logo

Practice—Offer to settle—Technical error in Pt 36 offer

30 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

AF v BG [2009] EWCA Civ 757, [2009] All ER (D) 249 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lloyd and Rimer LJJ, 21 Jul 2009

A CPR Pt 36 offer may be made by a defendant in respect of a claim and potential counterclaim, even if the latter has not yet been pleaded.

The respondent (the defendant to the original proceedings) wrote a letter to the applicant (the claimant) headed “without prejudice save as to costs” and “Pt 36 offer”. It was stated that, inter alia, the applicant was obliged to reimburse the respondent for certain expenditure under a collateral agreement. It further stated that the respondent had a counterclaim against the applicant which had not at that time been pleaded. The letter stated that the respondent was “willing to accept payment of [a specified sum, smaller than that identified...as the subject of the intended counterclaim] (the sum) in full and final settlement of the whole of our client’s claim and the whole of your claim against our client in the claim. This letter is intended to have the consequences of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll