header-logo header-logo

30 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Practice—Offer to settle—Technical error in Pt 36 offer

AF v BG [2009] EWCA Civ 757, [2009] All ER (D) 249 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lloyd and Rimer LJJ, 21 Jul 2009

A CPR Pt 36 offer may be made by a defendant in respect of a claim and potential counterclaim, even if the latter has not yet been pleaded.

The respondent (the defendant to the original proceedings) wrote a letter to the applicant (the claimant) headed “without prejudice save as to costs” and “Pt 36 offer”. It was stated that, inter alia, the applicant was obliged to reimburse the respondent for certain expenditure under a collateral agreement. It further stated that the respondent had a counterclaim against the applicant which had not at that time been pleaded. The letter stated that the respondent was “willing to accept payment of [a specified sum, smaller than that identified...as the subject of the intended counterclaim] (the sum) in full and final settlement of the whole of our client’s claim and the whole of your claim against our client in the claim. This letter is intended to have the consequences of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll