header-logo header-logo

05 September 2008
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Costs
printer mail-detail

Law Reports Bankruptcy—Trustee in bankruptcy—Removal from office

Donaldson and another v O’Sullivan and another [2008] EWCA Civ 879, [2008] All ER (D) 393

Court of Appeal, Civil Division; Ward, Dyson and Lloyd LJJ; 30 July 2008

Section 303(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) confers power on the court to appoint a new trustee in bankruptcy, which it can exercise so as to replace a trustee removed under s 298 of IA 1986. That is also the position in compulsory liquidations under s 168(3).

Jeffrey Littman (instructed by Morgans) for the applicant. Christopher Brockman (instructed by Meade King) for the respondent. Richard Ritchie (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the official receiver.

The applicant was discharged from bankruptcy with liabilities still outstanding. In 2006, her trustee in bankruptcy applied for a block transfer order which would have the effect of removing him from office as trustee in bankruptcy of the appellant, and appointing the respondent in his place. The judge allowed the trustee’s application, however, the respondent was not willing to proceed with respect to the applicant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll