header-logo header-logo

Law Reports Bankruptcy—Trustee in bankruptcy—Removal from office

05 September 2008
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Costs
printer mail-detail

Donaldson and another v O’Sullivan and another [2008] EWCA Civ 879, [2008] All ER (D) 393

Court of Appeal, Civil Division; Ward, Dyson and Lloyd LJJ; 30 July 2008

Section 303(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) confers power on the court to appoint a new trustee in bankruptcy, which it can exercise so as to replace a trustee removed under s 298 of IA 1986. That is also the position in compulsory liquidations under s 168(3).

Jeffrey Littman (instructed by Morgans) for the applicant. Christopher Brockman (instructed by Meade King) for the respondent. Richard Ritchie (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the official receiver.

The applicant was discharged from bankruptcy with liabilities still outstanding. In 2006, her trustee in bankruptcy applied for a block transfer order which would have the effect of removing him from office as trustee in bankruptcy of the appellant, and appointing the respondent in his place. The judge allowed the trustee’s application, however, the respondent was not willing to proceed with respect to the applicant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll