header-logo header-logo

22 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Crimminal law—Terrorism—Terrorist offences

R v K [2008] EWCA Crim 185, [2008] All ER (D) 188 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Criminal Division

Lord Phillips CJ, Owen and Bean JJ

13 February 2008

A document or record will only fall within s 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000) if it is of a kind that is likely to provide practical assistance to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism. A document which simply encourages the commission of acts of terrorism does not fall within s 58.

Timothy Moloney (assigned by the registrar of criminal appeals) for the defendant.

Jonathan Sharp (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.

The defendant was charged on an indictment containing three counts, each alleging an offence contrary to TA 2000, s 58, namely that the defendant possessed records containing information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism. Count one referred to a CD-Rom containing a copy of the Al Qaeda Training Manual.

Counts two and three related to publications called Zaad-e-Mujahid and The Absent Obligation, which were, respectively, a publication

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll