header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Civil procedure—Privilege—Law Society

Quinn Direct Insurance Ltd v The Law Society of England and Wales [2010] EWCA Civ 805, [2010] All ER (D) 134 (Jul).

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Andrew Morritt C, Rimer and Jackson LJJ, 14 July 2010.

There is no reason to imply into the statutory scheme for the regulation of solicitors any provision or term entitling or obliging the Law Society to produce to a qualifying insurer documents emanating from a firm of solicitors into which it has intervened which are subject to the privilege of a client of the firm. If the client consents, or his privilege is impliedly waived by a claim against the solicitor, then the Society can produce such documents to the qualifying insurer.

N Davidson QC (instructed by Crutes LLP) for the insurers. T Dutton QC and M Smith (instructed by Devonshires Solicitors) for the Law Society.

The Law Society formed the view that a firm (SBS) had not complied with the Solicitors’ Accounts Rules, and intervened in the practice pursuant to its powers under s 35 of and Sch 1 to the Solicitors Act 1974 accordingly.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll