header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Costs—Assessment—Estimate of costs

Rowles-Davies and others v Call 24-7 Ltd [2010] EWHC 1695 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 96 (Jul).

Bernard Livesey QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court,
7 July 2010.

The Chancery Division of the High Court ruled on the issue of costs following a previous judgment on the substantive issues between the parties in respect of the construction of a term in a contract for the provision of solicitor audit services by a company owned by the first claimant to the defendant company.

James Couser (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimants. Iain Pester (instructed by Nexus, Manchester ) for the defendant.

The proceedings concerned costs awards following judgment in the substantive action, which was handed down in June 2010 (see [2010] All ER (D) 121 (Jun). The claimants submitted, inter alia, that the unsuccessful party should be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party pursuant to CPR 44.3(2)(a) and that the court should have regard to the conduct of the defendant. On those grounds the claimants’ costs should be assessed on an indemnity basis. The defendant argued that the general

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll