header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Consumer credit—Fixed sum credit agreement—Prescribed terms

Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 plc v Walker and another [2010] UKSC 32

Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 plc v Walker and another [2010] UKSC 32
Supreme Court, 7 July 2010, Lord Hope (president), Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Lord Clarke.

A broker administration fee may form part of the “total cost of the credit” for the purposes of s 9(4) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974), separate from the loan itself, even if the consumer is lent the fee at a rate of interest by the lender at the same rate as the loan.

Richard Mawrey QC, Adrian Salter and Matthew Richardson (instructed by Turner Coulston) for the appellants. Nicholas Elliott QC and William Edwards (instructed by Rosling King LLP) for the respondent.

The borrowers obtained a loan of £17,500 from the lender’s predecessor in title. The parties signed a credit agreement which, it was common ground, was regulated by CCA 1974. The agreement included a “Broker Administration Fee” advanced to the borrowers of £875. Interest was payable on the fee at the same rate as the loan. The borrowers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll