header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

European Union—Freedom of movement—Medicinal products.

R (on the application of Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry) v Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (the NHS Confederation (Employers) Company Ltd intervening) C-62/09, [2010] All ER (D) 142 (Apr)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber) Judges Bonichot (President of Chamber), Toader (Rapporteur), Schiemann, Kuris and Bay Larsen22 April 2010

Article 94(1) of Parliament and Council Directive (EC) 2001/83 (the Directive) does not preclude financial incentive schemes implemented by national public health authorities in order to reduce their public health expenditure and designed to encourage, for the purpose of treating certain conditions, the prescription by doctors of specific named medicinal products containing an active substance which was different from the active substance of the medicinal product which was previously prescribed or which might have been prescribed but for such an incentive scheme.

In England and Wales, general practitioners and other health care professionals were granted specific powers to write prescriptions and, if they issued prescriptions funded by the NHS, they had to comply with NHS rules and prescription codes, as well as professional codes of conduct issued by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll