header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Practice—Injunction—Injunction against rest of world

TUV v Person or Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 853 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 156 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Eady J, 22 Apr 2010

When seeking an injunction against persons unknown in respect of copyrighted material, an applicant should generally be required only to serve those in the media whom it has reason to believe would have an interest in the story.

Richard Spearman QC (instructed by Schillings) for the applicant.

The applicant’s laptop was stolen in a burglary. It contained electronic information, including visual images of the applicant and other persons. A friend had made an assignment of copyright to the applicant in anticipation of the instant proceedings. The individuals who stole the laptop had not been identified. The applicant obtained an interim injunction without notice against “persons unknown”. The order was based primarily upon claims to be brought to restrain infringement of privacy and possible breaches of copyright. The order contained provisions relating to anonymity and restricting access to the documents on the court file. There were also obligations imposed on the respondents, once served, to provide information and deliver

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll