header-logo header-logo

18 March 2010
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Contract—Construction—Contractual term

RTS Flexible Systems Ltd (Respondent) v Molkerei Alois Muller Gmbh & Co KG (UK Production) (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 14, [2010] All ER (D) 95 (Mar)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips (President), Lord Mance, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke 10 March 2010

The Supreme Court has considered the principles concerning the terms governing relations between parties where no formal contract has been concluded.

Stuart Catchpole QC and Charles Manzoni QC (instructed by Addleshaw Goddard LLP) for the respondent. Kenneth MacLean QC and Michael Fealy (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) for the appellant.

The defendant produced different brands of yoghurt and dairy rice products. The claimant specialised in the supply of automated machines for packaging and product handling in the food and consumer goods industry. The defendant wished to automate some of its processes and began negotiations with the claimant. Following a number of quotations by the claimant, the defendant sent a letter of intent, which covered an initial period, but which subsequently lapsed.

The claimant started work before the terms of the contract had been agreed. Negotiations ensued as to the final contractual terms; however, the final

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll