header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Marine insurance—Actual or constructive total loss of cargo—Piracy

Masefield AG v Amlin Corporate Member Ltd [2010] All ER (D) 210 (Feb)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, David Steel J,
18 February 2010

The seizure of a vessel by pirates does not of itself constitute an actual total loss (ATL) or a constructive total loss (CTL) for the purposes of ss 57(1) and 60(1) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 (MI 1906), although the issue is fact-sensitive.

Sir Sydney Kentridge Q.C. & Andrew Henshaw (instructed by Arbis LLP) for the claimant, Peter MacDonald Eggers & Sarah Cowey (instructed by Waltons & Morse LLP) for the defendant

In August 2008, a vessel was seized by Somali pirates in the Gulf of Aden. The claimant was the owner of two parcels of bio-diesel which had been shipped on board the vessel. The defendant was the insurer of the cargo under an open cover contract covering, inter alia, both piracy and theft. Shortly after the seizure, negotiations between the pirates and the owners began.

On 18 September, during the course of the negotiations, the claimant served a notice of abandonment on the defendant.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll