header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Marine insurance—Actual or constructive total loss of cargo—Piracy

Masefield AG v Amlin Corporate Member Ltd [2010] All ER (D) 210 (Feb)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, David Steel J,
18 February 2010

The seizure of a vessel by pirates does not of itself constitute an actual total loss (ATL) or a constructive total loss (CTL) for the purposes of ss 57(1) and 60(1) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 (MI 1906), although the issue is fact-sensitive.

Sir Sydney Kentridge Q.C. & Andrew Henshaw (instructed by Arbis LLP) for the claimant, Peter MacDonald Eggers & Sarah Cowey (instructed by Waltons & Morse LLP) for the defendant

In August 2008, a vessel was seized by Somali pirates in the Gulf of Aden. The claimant was the owner of two parcels of bio-diesel which had been shipped on board the vessel. The defendant was the insurer of the cargo under an open cover contract covering, inter alia, both piracy and theft. Shortly after the seizure, negotiations between the pirates and the owners began.

On 18 September, during the course of the negotiations, the claimant served a notice of abandonment on the defendant.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll