header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

SHIPPING—CHARTERPARTY—SAFE PORT

AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd [2007] EWHC 1182 (Comm), [2007] All ER (D) 280(May)

Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Gloster J
17 May 2007

The phrase “1 safe port Ventspils” in an amended Asbatankvoy form is not merely a mutual agreement between the owner and charterer that the port is in fact safe, but a warranty by the charterer; moreover, a port can be rendered unsafe because of a need for lightering to get into or out of it. “Safely” means “safely as a laden ship”; there can be no distinction between loading and discharging.

Steven Berry QC and Edmund King (instructed by Holman Fenwick) for the claimant.  Timothy Young QC (instructed by Eversheds) for the defendant.

The proceedings concerned a charter substantially on the Asbatankvoy form and incorporating the charterer’s standard terms. The vessel was an Aframax oil tanker. The voyages were to load gasoil “1 safe port Ventspils” with discharge to various ports in named locations. A dispute arose concerning the sixth voyage, when the vessel arrived at Venspils to load a cargo. Due to previous weather conditions, the dredged channel had silted up.

Because

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll