header-logo header-logo

Jurisdiction—Appeal from decision of judge to which leapfrog certificate relates

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Jones and others) v Ceredigion County Council [2007] UKHL 24, [2007] All ER (D) 380 (May)

House of Lords

Lord Bingham, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott, Lord Mance and Lord Neuberger.

23 May 2007

The words “decision of the judge to which the certificate relates” in s 13(2)(a) of the Administration of Justice Act 1969 (AJA 1969) is limited to a decision in respect of which the House of Lords has granted permission for an appeal.

Andrew Nicol QC and Nicholas Bowen (instructed by Russell Jones & Walker) for the claimants.
Nigel Giffin QC and Jane McCafferty (instructed by Sharpe Pritchard) for the authority.

The claimants applied for judicial review of a decision of a non-statutory panel of the defendant local authority. Two issues arose on the application. The claimants had to succeed on both in order to quash the decision.
The judge ruled in favour of the claimants and granted the defendant permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal. Counsel also applied for a certificate under AJA 1969, s 12 to permit an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll