header-logo header-logo

Civil procedure—Closed material procedure—Applicability to civil claims

26 November 2009
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Al Rawi and others v The Security Service and others [2009] EWHC 2959 (QB)

Queen’s Bench Division, 18 November 2009, Silber J

The “closed material” procedure involving special advocates may be adopted in a civil claim for damages.

Timothy Otty QC, Richard Hermer QC and Tom Hickman (instructed by Birnberg Peirce &Co) for the first, second and fourth claimants. Michael Fordham QC and Naina Patel (i) (instructed by Birnberg Peirce & Co) for the third and fifth claimants (ii) (instructed by Leigh Day& Co) for the sixth claimant and (iii) (instructed by Christian Khan) for the seventh claimant.

Jonathan Crow QC, Karen Steyn, Daniel Beard and Andrew O’Connor (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendants. Liberty and Justice, the interveners, made joint written submissions prepared by Nigel Pleming QC, Eric Metcalfe and Corinna Ferguson.

The seven claimants were all former detainees who had been held by various foreign states, including by the United States using its facility at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, and to have thereby suffered ill-treatment.

The defendants were organs of the state which were alleged to have caused

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll