header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Divorce—Financial provision—Matters to be considered by court when making order

Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, [2007] All ER (D) 425 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division

Sir Mark Potter P, Thorpe and Wilson LJJ

24 May 2007

Determination of whether there should be any “special contribution” by one party under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) takes place within the statutory exercise. The “sharing principle” applies to all the parties’ property but, to the extent that their property is non-matrimonial, there is likely to be better reason for departure from equality.

Barry Singleton QC, Alan Boyle QC, Deborah Eaton, Deepak Nagpal and Dakis Hagen (instructed by Withers LLP) for the husband.
Martin Pointer QC, Christopher Nugee QC, James Ewins and Andrew Mold (instructed by Manches LLP) for the wife.

The parties married in 1976. To the marriage they brought their earning capacities but at that time they had in effect no capital assets. They had two children. Considerable assets were earned by the husband during the marriage. In 2004 the wife issued a petition for divorce and applied for ancillary relief in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll