header-logo header-logo

23 October 2009
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Construction law—Adjudication—Jurisdiction

Balfour Beatty Engineering Services (HY) Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd, [2009] EWHC 2218 (TCC), [2009] All ER (D) 125 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court,  Akenhead J, 1 September 2009

The Technology and Construction Court has considered authority on jurisdiction and bias in the context of adjudicators under construction contracts.

Martin Bowdery QC (instructed by Mayer Brown International LLP) for the claimant. Stephen Furst QC (instructed by Hawkswell Kilvington) for the defendant.

The defendant was the main contractor on a project at Castle Hill Hospital, Hull. It sub-contracted part of the works to the claimant. Delays occurred and a dispute arose as to whether extensions of time had been due to the claimant. In September 2008, the claimant served a notice of adjudication on the defendant and an adjudicator was appointed (the first adjudicator).

The adjudication notice limited the dispute to the defendant’s right to make deductions and the claimant’s entitlement to an extension of time because of the defendant’s failure to provide the claimant with access to commence the works. The notice specified that, although the claimant believed that it had had other grounds

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll