header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Contempt of court- Private action against witness in litigation- Permission to bring private proceedings for contempt.

KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton [2008] EWCA Civ 1280, [2008] All ER (D) 200 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Arden and Moore-Bick LJJ, 20 Nov 2008

The court should exercise great caution before giving permission to bring private proceedings for contempt of court where it appears that a witness has made untrue statements under oath. It would have to require a strong case both that the statement in question was untrue and that the maker knew that it was untrue at the time he made it.

Iain Purvis QC and Kathryn Pickard (instructed by Robinsons) for the claimant. David Waters QC and Dean Armstrong (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the defendant.

The well-known motorcycle manufacturer, Honda Motor Co Ltd and its UK subsidiary (collectively, Honda), brought proceedings in England against the claimant in the instant case, who was a motorcycle dealer. Honda alleged infringement of its trademarks and applied for summary judgment. The claimant opposed the application. In response, Honda filed further statements, one of which was made by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll