header-logo header-logo

03 April 2019
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Law firms acting to close the gender pay gap

Law firms with more than 250 employees were due to submit their gender pay gap reports this week.

Failure to meet the deadline could lead to an Equality and Human Rights Commission discrimination investigation and a court order. The annual report became a legal obligation in 2017.

According to employment law firm GQ|Littler, law and accountancy firms have deployed a range of tactics to help close the gap. They include: enforcing gender-balanced shortlists in the recruitment process, including 50:50 targets for senior positions; six-month paid senior internships to help senior professionals return to work following a break, for example, to care for children; agile working and flexible hours; financial assistance for childcare; increased parental leave; unconscious bias training; and mentoring and coaching. 

Hannah Mahon, partner at GQ|Littler, said: ‘These action plans are evidence that employers are now actively engaging with the stubborn gender pay gap problem in the UK.’

Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll