header-logo header-logo

09 August 2024
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 9 August 2024

Criminal law

Cobban and another v Director of Public Prosecutions [2024] EWHC 1908 (Admin), [2024] All ER (D) 131 (Jul)

The Administrative Court dismissed the appellants’ appeal by way of case stated against their convictions of improperly using a public electronic communications network contrary to s 127(1) of the Communications Act 2003 while engaged in private consensual messaging on a WhatsApp group and refused their judicial review applications in relation to their sentence of 12 weeks’ immediate custody for each offence. The appellants had sent messages between serving officers of the Metropolitan Police Service which were held by the district judge at the Magistrates’ Court to be of a ‘grossly offensive’ nature. The court, deciding that Director of Public Prosecutions v Collins [2006] 4 All 2006] 4 All ER 602 had binding authority, held that s 127(1) of the Act may criminalise the consensual exchange of indecent material using a public electronic communications network. On the facts of the present case, no assistance could be gained in determining whether the messages were ‘grossly offensive’ in the eyes of a reasonable member

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll