header-logo header-logo

08 October 2021
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 8 October 2021

Abuse

Blackpool Football Club Ltd v DSN [2021] EWCA Civ 1352, [2021] All ER (D) 33 (Sep)

The appellant football club, Blackpool FC, appealed against a decision that it was vicariously liable for the acts of FR, a talent scout, when he had sexually abused the respondent, DSN, then aged 13, while on a trip to New Zealand organised by FR in 1987 (see [2020] All ER (D) 92 (Mar)). The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in allowing the appeal on the vicarious liability grounds, held, among other things, that: (i) the evidence as identified by the judge had not justified a finding that the relationship between Blackpool FC and FR was one that could properly be treated as akin to employment. However, on the limitation grounds concerning the disapplication of the applicable primary limitation period pursuant to s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980, the court held that the judge had been entitled to conclude that no real risk of substantial or significant prejudice had been caused to Blackpool FC by the delay in the issue of proceedings so long after

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll