header-logo header-logo

08 July 2022
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 8 July 2022

Carriers

Knapfield v C.A.R.S Holding Ltd (Company No. 05481676) and other companies [2022] EWHC 1437 (Comm), [2022] All ER (D) 47 (Jun)

The Commercial Court ruled on the claim brought by the applicant, an owner and collector of classic cars, against the defendants, an events management company and transport companies. The applicant sought damages for the damage and diminution in value of two valuable cars while in the possession of the defendants in July 2019. He alleged that (i) the defendants were liable for damages for misrepresentation under s 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967; and (ii) that the defendants had entered into a contract with the applicant whereby it agreed to reimburse the applicant for the damage which had occurred in full, and that contract being separate to the Carriage of Goods Road Act 1965 which had incorporated the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR). The second defendant had accepted that it was legally liable for the damage sustained but the other defendants did not accept liability. The court held, among other things, that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll