header-logo header-logo

13 January 2023
Issue: 8008 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 6 & 13 January 2023

Child

Re N (a child) (instruction of expert) [2022] EWCA Civ 1588, [2022] All ER (D) 24 (Dec)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellant’s appeal against a case management order under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) relating to a boy, A, a minor. The order under appeal had permitted the parties to instruct a named independent social worker to carry out an assessment to assist the court to determine issues relating to child arrangements and education. The expert named in the order was a woman. The appellant father had proposed that the assessment should be carried out by a male social worker. He had argued that the order which had permitted the instruction of a female social worker was an infringement of his right to a fair hearing under art 6 and his right to manifest his religious beliefs under art 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The court held, among other things, that the judge was fully entitled to reject the father’s human rights arguments. The decision to appoint the expert was consistent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll