header-logo header-logo

05 June 2026
Issue: 8164 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 5 Jun 2026

Costs

Dentons UK and Middle East LLP v SRA Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 655

The Court of Appeal ruled on costs issues arising from its judgment of 27 April 2026, which allowed Dentons UK and Middle East LLP’s appeal against a decision of Lang J, itself made on appeal from the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) in proceedings brought by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd (SRA). The key issue was whether the SRA, as a regulatory body, should be protected from adverse costs orders. The court held that the principle in Baxendale-Walker v Law Society, which provides that no presumption exists that costs follow the event in proceedings before the SDT, does not extend to appeals from the SDT. The court found itself bound by Wingate v SRA, which established that parties on appeal stand on equal footing in a costs-shifting regime under the CPR. The court reasoned that the SRA’s position on appeal, having the benefit of a determination by the SDT, was akin to that of a normal litigant. The court ordered that the SRA pay 65% of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll