header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 5 December 2025

05 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Compulsory purchase

R (L1T FM Holdings Ltd and Letterone Core Investments Sàrl) v Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in the Cabinet Office [2025] EWCA Civ 1528

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a judgment of the Administrative Court which had rejected a claim for judicial review of a ‘final order’ made under s 26(3) of the National Security and Investment Act 2021. The order required the appellant to divest its 100% shareholding in Upp Corporation Ltd, a fibre broadband start-up company, due to national security risks arising from the ultimate beneficial ownership of the LetterOne Group by certain Russian nationals creating vulnerability to leverage by the Russian state. The appellants argued that they suffered financial loss because they could not obtain fair market value in the forced sale and that Art 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights required compensation beyond what they obtained from the sale. The court held that the principle of proportionality was satisfied without additional compensation, as the appellants were able to conduct a sale in the open market and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll