header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 4 June 2021

Claim form

Matthew and others v Sedman and others [2021] UKSC 19, [2021] All ER (D) 61 (May)

In the context of calculating a limitation period in a midnight deadline case, even if the cause of action had accrued at the very start of the day following midnight, that day was a complete undivided day, such that it should be included in the computation of the limitation period. Accordingly, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal which arose in respect of one of two court-approved schemes of arrangement, and where the issue concerned the calculation of the limitation period in respect of causes of action which had accrued at, or on the expiry of, the midnight hour at the end of Thursday 2 June 2011. The appellants, who were the current trustees in respect of a will, had appealed after the respondent former trustees had been granted summary judgment in respect of the appellants’ claim (the Welcome claim), alleging negligence and breach of trust (among other things), on the basis that that claim (issued on Monday 5 June 2017) had been issued outside

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll