header-logo header-logo

31 July 2026
Issue: 8172 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 31 July 2026

Divorce

Meerna Ali Ghuloom Faraj v Sohail Sultan Ahmad and IIB Group Holdings WLL [2026] EWCA Civ 962

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the appeals of the husband, the wife, and IIB Group Holdings against the judgment of Sir Jonathan Cohen in financial remedy proceedings between Meerna Ali Ghuloom Faraj (the wife) and Sohail Sultan Ahmad (the husband). The husband appealed the order requiring him to pay the wife a lump sum of £6m, contending the judge wrongly found he had £16m in disputed accounts. The wife cross-appealed the finding that a forward acquisition property (FAP) agreement concerning the former matrimonial home was not a sham transaction. IIB appealed paragraph 10 of the order requiring it to endeavour to agree terms for providing housing to the wife. The court held that the husband’s appeal succeeded on grounds of procedural unfairness because the wife’s case that the disputed accounts existed and contained funds available to him was not put to the husband in cross-examination, constituting a fundamental breach of fairness per Tui UK Ltd v Griffiths. The wife’s appeal succeeded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll