header-logo header-logo

30 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 30 May 2025

Commons

Darwall and another v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2025] UKSC 20

This is an appeal to the Supreme Court regarding whether s 10(1) of the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985 confers on the public a right to pitch tents or otherwise make camp overnight on Dartmoor Commons. The court analysed the wording of s 10(1) in its statutory context, including the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 and the Law of Property Act 1925. The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that s 10(1), on its true construction, does confer such a right to wild camp on the Commons.


Costs

Shorts International Ltd v Google LLC [2025] EWCA Civ 653

This was an appeal to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) from a decision dismissing a claim for trade mark infringement heard in the Business and Property Courts (Intellectual Property List) concerning the determination of the claimant’s application for a costs capping order and the defendant’s application for security for costs. The court held that the proceedings were a claim for trade mark infringement which began in the Intellectual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll