header-logo header-logo

03 February 2023
Issue: 8011 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 3 February 2023

Child

R v T [2022] EWHC 3362 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 56 (Jan)

The Family Division ruled on preliminary issues concerning jurisdiction, which arose in the course of the British applicant’s applications, seeking orders for the children (including A) to spend time with her, following the breakdown of her civil partnership with the respondent (the children’s gestational mother). The children (who were British, but currently lived in the UAE with the respondent) had been conceived through IVF or intrauterine insemination. The applicant contended that she was the children’s legal and psychological mother and parent and that, if the English court declined to accept jurisdiction under the Family Law Act 1986, she would have no way of having her ‘parental rights’ determined because the UAE did not recognise parental rights relating to same-sex parents and criminalised same-sex relationships. The court considered, among other things, whether the applicant was a parent within the meaning of s 42 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 and, concerning the issue of consent to the respondent’s fertility treatment, it held that there had been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll