header-logo header-logo

28 May 2020
Issue: 7888 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 29 May 2020

Income tax

Fowler v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2020] UKSC 22, [2020] All ER (D) 124 (May)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, had decided that in the deemed world introduced by s 15(2) of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005, the taxpayer diver had been carrying on a business, and thus ‘an enterprise of a Contracting State’, within the meaning of Art 7(1) of the UK–South Africa Double Taxation Convention (the Treaty), which was not displaced by Art 14 of that Treaty. In allowing the Revenue and Customs Commissioners’ appeal against that decision, the Supreme Court held that nothing in s 15 of the 2005 Act purported to alter the settled meaning of the relevant terms of the Treaty, viewed from the perspective of UK tax law, with the result that, s 15 of that Act, understood in the light of s 6(5) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, charged income tax on the employment income of an employed diver, but in a particular manner which included the fiction that the diver

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll