header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 27 September 2024

27 September 2024
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Revenue & Customs Commissioners v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2024] UKSC 29, [2024] All ER (D) 27 (Sep)

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant, PGMOL’s, appeal. PGMOL was a non-profit service company providing referees to league football matches in the UK and FA Cup fixtures. The part-time referees were paid match fees, expenses and were eligible for bonuses based on performance. The case concerned whether PGMOL was liable to make deductions for income tax and National Insurance contributions in respect of these part-time referees to the respondent (HMRC). The issues were whether two key elements for the establishment of an employment contract were present. It was held that the minimum requirements of mutuality of obligation and control necessary for a contract of employment between the National Group referees and PGMOL were satisfied in relation to the individual contracts. In light of its conclusion that these minimum requirements were met, the Supreme Court remitted the case to the First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) for it to decide whether the individual contracts were contracts of employment.


Employment

Tesco Stores Ltd v Union

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll