header-logo header-logo

27 June 2025
Issue: 8122 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 27 June 2025

Costs

The New Lottery Company Ltd and another company v The Gambling Commission [2025] EWHC 1522 (TCC)

The Technology and Construction Court rejected the applications for security for costs by the defendant Gambling Commission and interested parties to the proceedings. The litigation arose from the Gambling Commission's procurement process for the award of the fourth National Lottery licence which took place between 2019 and 2022. The claimants did not succeed in obtaining the licence and made two claims challenging the fairness of the procurement process and the decision to award the fourth licence to the interested parties, claiming damages of approximately £1.3bn. The court considered two issues: (i) an entirely novel point as to whether the court had the power to award security for costs in favour of an interested party joined to the proceedings in that capacity; (ii) whether a parent company with limited assets may rely upon evidence of its control over a wholly owned subsidiary with substantial assets in order to avoid a determination that an order for security for costs should be made against it. The court held

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll