header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 27 June 2025

27 June 2025
Issue: 8122 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

The New Lottery Company Ltd and another company v The Gambling Commission [2025] EWHC 1522 (TCC)

The Technology and Construction Court rejected the applications for security for costs by the defendant Gambling Commission and interested parties to the proceedings. The litigation arose from the Gambling Commission's procurement process for the award of the fourth National Lottery licence which took place between 2019 and 2022. The claimants did not succeed in obtaining the licence and made two claims challenging the fairness of the procurement process and the decision to award the fourth licence to the interested parties, claiming damages of approximately £1.3bn. The court considered two issues: (i) an entirely novel point as to whether the court had the power to award security for costs in favour of an interested party joined to the proceedings in that capacity; (ii) whether a parent company with limited assets may rely upon evidence of its control over a wholly owned subsidiary with substantial assets in order to avoid a determination that an order for security for costs should be made against it. The court held

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll