header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 21 November 2025

21 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Dover Farm Developments Ltd v Lucas and others [2025] EWHC 2862 (KB)

The King’s Bench Division ruled on costs following a hearing where both parties’ applications were unsuccessful. The defendants’ strike-out application was dismissed, and the claimants’ application to amend their particulars of claim was refused because they had not provided a proper draft of the amendments. The claim was subsequently stayed and the parties engaged in a successful court-mediated settlement, with only the costs of the hearing remaining unresolved. Applying CPR 44.2, the court determined that while the general rule would make the defendants liable for the costs of the strike-out application and the claimants liable for the costs of the amendment application, several factors warranted consideration, including that both applications were heard together, the defendants later consented to amended particulars, and the hearing facilitated the eventual mediation. The court assessed the claimants’ recoverable costs at £4,597.44 and the defendants’ costs at £493.32, resulting in a net payment of £4,104.12 due from the defendants to the claimants.


Family proceedings

R (Children: Setting aside Hague return order) [2025] EWCA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll