header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 20 June 2025

20 June 2025
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

The Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process and Industrial Developments Ltd and another [2025] EWCA Civ 715

The Court of Appeal refused the application for permission to appeal by Mr Seamus Andrew, a solicitor and barrister, against findings made against him in the Commercial Court judgment. The findings concerned allegations of misconduct, including improper retention of the Federal Republic of Nigeria’s (FRN) privileged documents, during arbitration proceedings where Mr Andrew acted as counsel for Process & Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID). In dealing with two preliminary questions, the court held that the application for permission to appeal was out of time and should be refused on that ground alone; further, that the court did not have jurisdiction to entertain this application for permission to appeal, permission to appeal not having been obtained from the judge. Among other things, the judge ruled that the judge’s finding that Mr Andrew’s conduct in not stopping the use by P&ID of FRN internal legal documents and returning them to FRN was ‘indefensible’ was plainly correct. The judgment upheld specific findings of dishonesty against Mr Andrew,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll