header-logo header-logo

20 January 2023
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 20 January 2023

Family proceedings

Re HH (a child) (contact order: stay of order pending appeal) [2022] EWHC 3369 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 05 (Jan)

The Family Division granted the appellant mother an interim stay of a contact order which had been granted to the father in circumstances where the mother’s challenge on the findings of fact and on procedural unfairness during the hearing were pending permission to appeal (PTA). The court so ruled on the basis that it was satisfied that: (i) the mother’s grounds of appeal were not fanciful; and (ii) if an interim stay was not awarded, the viability of the mother’s appeal would be extinguished. That criteria had to be met for the appeal court to award an interim stay pending the decision on PTA on the basis that the court should be focusing on whether the refusal of such an interim stay would stifle the proposed appeal or render it nugatory. Further, in such circumstances, it should not be seen as being of the same character as a full stay of execution awarded at the same time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll