header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 2 June 2023

02 June 2023
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Forster v Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP [2023] EWHC 1150 (Ch), [2023] All ER (D) 59 (May)

The Chancery Division allowed the claimant’s claim. She had brought proceedings against her former solicitors, who had acted for her under a conditional fee arrangement, seeking damages for loss caused by alleged breaches of duty. The court held that the priorities of the conditional fee arrangement had been varied by agreement reached outside court. Further, the claimant had lost the chance to enforce a Tomlin order. That chance had been worth £192,500, and judgment would be entered in her favour for that sum.


Jurisdiction

A grantor v A grantee[2023] UKUT 23 (LC), [2023] All ER (D) 69 (May)

The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) considered whether it had jurisdiction to award costs in circumstances where it had acted as an arbitrator and had allowed the claimant landowner and grantor’s claim for compensation for ‘injurious affection’. The Upper Tribunal refused the respondent, the grantee’s, argument that the tribunal had had no jurisdiction to award costs against it. The respondent was the current owner

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll