header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 19 January 2024

Family proceedings

MB v KB and others [2024] All ER (D) 01 (Jan), [2023] EWHC 3299 (Fam)

The High Court, Family Division, ruled on various costs points in dispute in respect of an application by the applicant father in which he had sought the summary return of the second and third respondent children to Qatar following their removal to the UK by the respondent mother. That application had been dismissed. It fell to be determined, among other things, whether: (i) an order that the father should have paid those costs should have been granted; and (ii) the father should have paid the costs of his unsuccessful application for a disclosure order against the Home Office. The court held, among other things, that: (i) the father had not behaved reprehensibly in the conduct of the litigation or otherwise taken an unreasonable stance and there would be no order for costs; and (ii) the application could not have been properly categorised as either amounting to reprehensible behaviour on behalf of the father or as representing an unreasonable stance on his part and there would

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll