header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 19 January 2024

Family proceedings

MB v KB and others [2024] All ER (D) 01 (Jan), [2023] EWHC 3299 (Fam)

The High Court, Family Division, ruled on various costs points in dispute in respect of an application by the applicant father in which he had sought the summary return of the second and third respondent children to Qatar following their removal to the UK by the respondent mother. That application had been dismissed. It fell to be determined, among other things, whether: (i) an order that the father should have paid those costs should have been granted; and (ii) the father should have paid the costs of his unsuccessful application for a disclosure order against the Home Office. The court held, among other things, that: (i) the father had not behaved reprehensibly in the conduct of the litigation or otherwise taken an unreasonable stance and there would be no order for costs; and (ii) the application could not have been properly categorised as either amounting to reprehensible behaviour on behalf of the father or as representing an unreasonable stance on his part and there would

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll