header-logo header-logo

18 February 2021
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 19 February 2021

Court of Protection

Re TA (recording of hearings; communication with court office) A local authority v TA and others [2021] EWCOP 3, [2021] All ER (D) 91 (Jan)

In proceedings concerning an elderly woman with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia (GA), for whom the local authority was responsible, and who was currently cared for at home by her adult son (TA), the Court of Protection made an ‘exceptional’ order, namely an injunction, to restrain TA from communicating with the court office by email and telephone. Further, in circumstances where TA had allegedly referred to himself as a ‘Wikileaks Wannabe’, and where (in the context of remote hearings due to the COVID-19 pandemic) he contended that he was ‘outside the jurisdiction of the court’ and could record conversations as he wished while in ‘his jurisdiction’ (his home), the court indicated that it would not accede to his application for permission to record the court hearings, concerning GA. It considered that there would be a ‘publication’ of any recorded information from the proceedings, and that to do so without authorisation would be a civil contempt,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll