header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 18 July 2025

18 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

The Republic of India v CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd (in administration) and other companies [2025] EWHC 1738 (Comm)

The King’s Bench Division heard an application regarding the joinder of parties to an arbitration claim and whether preliminary issues should be addressed before a substantive question of law under s 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The central point was whether the arbitral tribunal, seated in England, must exclusively apply Mauritian law to determine representation of the Mauritian companies involved. The tribunal had previously ruled that Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP could act on behalf of the Mauritian companies in arbitration despite contrary claims by an administrator appointed under Mauritian insolvency law. The court directed the determination of proposed preliminary issues as a case management measure. Further it was appropriate to add the Mauritian Companies ‘represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP on the instructions of the directors and shareholders of the said companies’ as interveners.


Building safety

Triathlon Homes LLP v Stratford Village Development Partnership and other companies [2025] EWCA Civ 846

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll