header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 18 & 25 April 2025

18 April 2025
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Barry and another v Barry [2025] EWHC 819 (KB)

This is a judgment on costs in the King’s Bench Division, following a trial in a family contractual dispute between parents and son over repayment of loans. The claimant parents succeeded in their claims against the defendant son and were awarded damages at trial. The key legal findings relate to the interpretation and application of Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules regarding offers to settle, particularly the consequences when a claimant beats their Part 36 offer, including entitlement to enhanced interest, costs on an indemnity basis, and an additional amount penalty.


Henderson & Jones Ltd v Salica Investments Ltd and others [2025] EWHC 838 (Comm)

This is an appeal following a judgment in favour of the claimant (litigation funder as assignee) against the first and fourth defendants for breach of confidence. The court awarded the claimant negotiating damages of £2,154,285 plus interest. The key issues decided were the validity of the claimant’s Part 36 offer, consequences of beating that offer, interest rates, costs, and permission to appeal.


Divorce

BR

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll