header-logo header-logo

17 October 2025
Issue: 8135 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 17 October 2025

Costs

R (Bates) v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court [2025] EWHC 2532 (Admin)

The Divisional Court ruled on the claimant’s applications for the costs incurred in bringing the judicial review proceedings and for ‘costs thrown away’ in the criminal proceedings in the magistrates’ court. The court determined that the decision in Murphy v Media Protection Services, which established an exceptionality requirement for awarding inter partes costs under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981) in criminal judicial review, was wrongly decided and should not be followed. The court held that s 51, SCA 1981 preserved the High Court’s discretion to award costs in judicial review proceedings involving criminal causes or matters without requiring exceptional circumstances. The court found that the interested party had acted improperly and vexatiously in initiating a private prosecution, which justified awarding costs against him in favour of the claimant. It was concluded that the costs of the judicial review should be assessed on a standard basis and the application regarding costs of the magistrates’ court proceedings should be remitted to the magistrates’ court for determination

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll